<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
  xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
  xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
  xmlns:podcast="https://podcastindex.org/namespace/1.0">
  <channel>
    <title>AI Honestly</title>
    <link>https://aihonestly.workandwhistle.co</link>
    <atom:link href="https://aihonestly.workandwhistle.co/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <podcast:guid>6d3725a2-7085-5217-b57b-b4ec53cab76b</podcast:guid>
    <description>I&apos;m Drew. I take real AI-related questions from founders and business owners, and I tell you what&apos;s real, what&apos;s not, and what it would take to build. No hype. No doom.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright>© 2026 Drew Thomas</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <itunes:author>Drew Thomas</itunes:author>
    <itunes:summary>I&apos;m Drew. I take real AI-related questions from founders and business owners, and I tell you what&apos;s real, what&apos;s not, and what it would take to build. No hype. No doom.</itunes:summary>
    <itunes:type>episodic</itunes:type>
    <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
    <itunes:image href="https://aihonestly.workandwhistle.co/artwork-v2.jpg"/>
    
    <itunes:category text="Technology"/>
    <itunes:owner>
      <itunes:name>Drew Thomas</itunes:name>
      <itunes:email>drew@workandwhistle.co</itunes:email>
    </itunes:owner>
    <item>
      <title>Can I build an AI speed-to-lead system?</title>
      <link>https://aihonestly.workandwhistle.co/episodes/can-i-build-an-ai-speed-to-lead-system</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ep-003</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <enclosure url="https://aihonestly.workandwhistle.co/dl/ep-003.mp3" length="10101971" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:07:01</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episode>3</itunes:episode>
      <description>Two people in one week asked Drew the same thing: can an AI answer inbound leads the instant they arrive — read the inquiry, reply intelligently, ask a smart question back, and log it — before the business owner even sees it? The short answer is yes, and Drew explains why it&apos;s one of the lower-hanging fruits in AI right now, citing the often-quoted MIT finding that replying within five minutes instead of thirty makes you dramatically more likely to reach and qualify a lead.

The real substance is the question underneath: buy off-the-shelf or build custom? Drew walks through exactly how he&apos;s built these systems — a VPS running Claude Code, Postmark to catch and send email, trained on your site and a page of rules — and argues that because the big platforms only sell &apos;speed to lead&apos; bundled into full nurture suites, most people are pushed toward custom. He closes with the things the salesperson won&apos;t tell you: where the human takes over, whether to disclose the AI, and the buy-versus-build tax.

In this episode

The MIT-cited stat: responding to a lead within five minutes instead of thirty makes you roughly 100x more likely to reach them — while the average business takes over a day.

People send inquiries to three or four businesses at once, so the first one to reply with something that isn&apos;t garbage usually wins the deal.

Under the hood it&apos;s simpler than people think: a VPS with Claude Code (or just a serverless function), Postmark to receive and send email as structured data, and an agent trained on your site, docs, or a page of rules.

Real response times run about four or five seconds — Drew undersells it as &apos;under a minute&apos; on his own site.

Off-the-shelf options like HubSpot and Salesforce bury lead-answering inside a whole nurture suite, so you buy the house to use the front door — which is why Drew says it mostly points to custom, a couple-days-to-a-week build.

Three things the seller won&apos;t mention: decide where the human takes over, choose whether to disclose it&apos;s AI (getting caught pretending is worse than saying so), and know you&apos;re paying either a platform tax or an upkeep tax.

Timestamps

0:00 — The question: AI that answers leads instantly

0:30 — Show intro

0:43 — What &apos;speed to lead&apos; really means

1:09 — Why speed wins: the MIT stat

2:05 — How it works under the hood

2:40 — The build: VPS, Postmark, Claude Code

3:24 — Custom vs. off-the-shelf

4:04 — What a custom build takes

5:08 — Platform users and Request Router

5:48 — What to watch for: handoff, disclosure, cost

6:52 — Wrap-up and send your question

Tools mentioned: Claude Code, Postmark, Request Router, HubSpot, Salesforce.

Got a question you&apos;ve been wondering about — can AI do this thing? Send it to drew@workandwhistle.co.

AI Honestly is a Work and Whistle production. More at workandwhistle.co.</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two people in one week asked Drew the same thing: can an AI answer inbound leads the instant they arrive — read the inquiry, reply intelligently, ask a smart question back, and log it — before the business owner even sees it? The short answer is yes, and Drew explains why it&#39;s one of the lower-hanging fruits in AI right now, citing the often-quoted MIT finding that replying within five minutes instead of thirty makes you dramatically more likely to reach and qualify a lead.</p>
<p>The real substance is the question underneath: buy off-the-shelf or build custom? Drew walks through exactly how he&#39;s built these systems — a VPS running Claude Code, Postmark to catch and send email, trained on your site and a page of rules — and argues that because the big platforms only sell &#39;speed to lead&#39; bundled into full nurture suites, most people are pushed toward custom. He closes with the things the salesperson won&#39;t tell you: where the human takes over, whether to disclose the AI, and the buy-versus-build tax.</p>
<h2>In this episode</h2>
<ul>
<li>The MIT-cited stat: responding to a lead within five minutes instead of thirty makes you roughly 100x more likely to reach them — while the average business takes over a day.</li>
<li>People send inquiries to three or four businesses at once, so the first one to reply with something that isn&#39;t garbage usually wins the deal.</li>
<li>Under the hood it&#39;s simpler than people think: a VPS with Claude Code (or just a serverless function), Postmark to receive and send email as structured data, and an agent trained on your site, docs, or a page of rules.</li>
<li>Real response times run about four or five seconds — Drew undersells it as &#39;under a minute&#39; on his own site.</li>
<li>Off-the-shelf options like HubSpot and Salesforce bury lead-answering inside a whole nurture suite, so you buy the house to use the front door — which is why Drew says it mostly points to custom, a couple-days-to-a-week build.</li>
<li>Three things the seller won&#39;t mention: decide where the human takes over, choose whether to disclose it&#39;s AI (getting caught pretending is worse than saying so), and know you&#39;re paying either a platform tax or an upkeep tax.</li>
</ul>
<h2>Timestamps</h2>
<ul>
<li>0:00 — The question: AI that answers leads instantly</li>
<li>0:30 — Show intro</li>
<li>0:43 — What &#39;speed to lead&#39; really means</li>
<li>1:09 — Why speed wins: the MIT stat</li>
<li>2:05 — How it works under the hood</li>
<li>2:40 — The build: VPS, Postmark, Claude Code</li>
<li>3:24 — Custom vs. off-the-shelf</li>
<li>4:04 — What a custom build takes</li>
<li>5:08 — Platform users and Request Router</li>
<li>5:48 — What to watch for: handoff, disclosure, cost</li>
<li>6:52 — Wrap-up and send your question</li>
</ul>
<p>Tools mentioned: Claude Code, Postmark, Request Router, HubSpot, Salesforce.</p>
<hr>
<p>Got a question you&#39;ve been wondering about — can AI do this thing? Send it to <a href="mailto:drew@workandwhistle.co">drew@workandwhistle.co</a>.</p>
<p><em>AI Honestly is a <strong>Work and Whistle</strong> production. More at <a href="https://workandwhistle.co">workandwhistle.co</a>.</em></p>]]></content:encoded>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://aihonestly.workandwhistle.co/transcripts/003.vtt" type="text/vtt"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Can I make an AI podcast?</title>
      <link>https://aihonestly.workandwhistle.co/episodes/can-i-make-an-ai-podcast</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ep-002</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <enclosure url="https://aihonestly.workandwhistle.co/dl/ep-002.mp3" length="8185378" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:05:41</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
      <description>Drew answers a question he gets all the time: can you actually make a whole podcast with AI? The proof is the show itself — this episode is built end to end with AI tools — and he walks through his exact pipeline, from rambling into a phone voice memo to a published feed. Along the way he&apos;s candid about where the human still has to step in and where the costs hide.

In this episode

The full workflow: talk into a voice memo, turn the auto-transcript into a script with AI, clean out the AI &apos;tells&apos; by hand, then render it through an ElevenLabs voice clone.

AI gets a script about 80% of the way; the last 20% is Drew manually cutting the em-dashes and &apos;it&apos;s not this, it&apos;s that&apos; phrasing people can smell.

A counterintuitive voice-cloning lesson: a too-polished clone sounds fake, and Drew&apos;s naturally flat, monotone delivery actually hides the AI tells.

Real costs are small but watch the credits — ElevenLabs Creator plan is $22/month and re-rendering edits burns credits fast; Cloudflare hosting runs to pennies.

A Claude Code pipeline publishes everything on command: show notes, the feed Apple/Spotify/Amazon pick up, a website page, analytics, and auto-extracted social clips.

The honest catch: AI solved production, not distribution — getting anyone to actually listen is still the real, unsolved job.

Timestamps

0:00 — The question: can AI make a whole podcast?

0:13 — What AI Honestly is

0:29 — Why people ask: skipping the tedious parts

0:57 — The workflow: just talk into a phone

1:13 — Turning a transcript into a script

1:33 — Cutting the AI tells by hand

2:01 — ElevenLabs, voice cloning, and music

2:20 — Why polished isn&apos;t always more real

2:47 — What it costs to do it yourself

3:13 — Publishing with Claude Code and Cloudflare

4:02 — Analytics and auto-generated clips

4:24 — The catches: pipeline setup time

4:45 — AI fixed production, not being heard

5:05 — So, can you do it? Yes, with a catch

5:30 — Send in your question

Tools mentioned: ElevenLabs, Claude Code, Cloudflare.

Got a question you&apos;ve been wondering about — can AI do this thing? Send it to drew@workandwhistle.co.

AI Honestly is a Work and Whistle production. More at workandwhistle.co.</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Drew answers a question he gets all the time: can you actually make a whole podcast with AI? The proof is the show itself — this episode is built end to end with AI tools — and he walks through his exact pipeline, from rambling into a phone voice memo to a published feed. Along the way he&#39;s candid about where the human still has to step in and where the costs hide.</p>
<h2>In this episode</h2>
<ul>
<li>The full workflow: talk into a voice memo, turn the auto-transcript into a script with AI, clean out the AI &#39;tells&#39; by hand, then render it through an ElevenLabs voice clone.</li>
<li>AI gets a script about 80% of the way; the last 20% is Drew manually cutting the em-dashes and &#39;it&#39;s not this, it&#39;s that&#39; phrasing people can smell.</li>
<li>A counterintuitive voice-cloning lesson: a too-polished clone sounds fake, and Drew&#39;s naturally flat, monotone delivery actually hides the AI tells.</li>
<li>Real costs are small but watch the credits — ElevenLabs Creator plan is $22/month and re-rendering edits burns credits fast; Cloudflare hosting runs to pennies.</li>
<li>A Claude Code pipeline publishes everything on command: show notes, the feed Apple/Spotify/Amazon pick up, a website page, analytics, and auto-extracted social clips.</li>
<li>The honest catch: AI solved production, not distribution — getting anyone to actually listen is still the real, unsolved job.</li>
</ul>
<h2>Timestamps</h2>
<ul>
<li>0:00 — The question: can AI make a whole podcast?</li>
<li>0:13 — What AI Honestly is</li>
<li>0:29 — Why people ask: skipping the tedious parts</li>
<li>0:57 — The workflow: just talk into a phone</li>
<li>1:13 — Turning a transcript into a script</li>
<li>1:33 — Cutting the AI tells by hand</li>
<li>2:01 — ElevenLabs, voice cloning, and music</li>
<li>2:20 — Why polished isn&#39;t always more real</li>
<li>2:47 — What it costs to do it yourself</li>
<li>3:13 — Publishing with Claude Code and Cloudflare</li>
<li>4:02 — Analytics and auto-generated clips</li>
<li>4:24 — The catches: pipeline setup time</li>
<li>4:45 — AI fixed production, not being heard</li>
<li>5:05 — So, can you do it? Yes, with a catch</li>
<li>5:30 — Send in your question</li>
</ul>
<p>Tools mentioned: ElevenLabs, Claude Code, Cloudflare.</p>
<hr>
<p>Got a question you&#39;ve been wondering about — can AI do this thing? Send it to <a href="mailto:drew@workandwhistle.co">drew@workandwhistle.co</a>.</p>
<p><em>AI Honestly is a <strong>Work and Whistle</strong> production. More at <a href="https://workandwhistle.co">workandwhistle.co</a>.</em></p>]]></content:encoded>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://aihonestly.workandwhistle.co/transcripts/002.vtt" type="text/vtt"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Can I replace my email program with AI?</title>
      <link>https://aihonestly.workandwhistle.co/episodes/can-i-replace-my-email-program-with-ai</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ep-001</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <enclosure url="https://aihonestly.workandwhistle.co/dl/ep-001.mp3" length="10481891" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:07:17</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episode>1</itunes:episode>
      <description>Can AI Replace Your Email Marketing Platform? (For Cheaper?)

Every month that email platform bill shows up, and it climbs as your list grows — because you&apos;re basically paying to store email addresses. So can you just rebuild the whole thing with AI and pay way less? Short answer: mostly yes, but &quot;cheaper&quot; comes with a trade. This week I break down the three versions of that answer, walk through the exact setup I&apos;ve used, and flag the stuff the savings pitch leaves out.

What&apos;s covered:

Why email platforms charge more as your list grows, and what you&apos;re actually paying them for (hint: it&apos;s deliverability, not the dashboard)

The three versions of &quot;replace it with AI&quot; — the basics, the custom bonus layer, and the top-end rebuild that&apos;s probably not worth it

The setup: Resend for sending, Supabase for storing your list, and AI agents to run the whole thing

Real costs — Resend&apos;s free tier (100 emails/day, 3,000/month) and the $20/month paid tier

How to build in unsubscribes the right way with a Supabase edge function

A custom example: auto-sending a one-time thank-you email on a customer&apos;s first purchase

Putting a simple interface on top so your team can send without touching a command line

Three things to watch for: owning your own edge cases, rebuilding advanced automations, and protecting your sender reputation on shared tiers

Tools mentioned: Resend, Supabase.

Got a question you&apos;ve been wondering about — can AI do this thing? Send it to drew@workandwhistle.co.

AI Honestly is a Work and Whistle production. More at workandwhistle.co.</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can AI Replace Your Email Marketing Platform? (For Cheaper?)</p>
<p>Every month that email platform bill shows up, and it climbs as your list grows — because you&#39;re basically paying to store email addresses. So can you just rebuild the whole thing with AI and pay way less? Short answer: mostly yes, but &quot;cheaper&quot; comes with a trade. This week I break down the three versions of that answer, walk through the exact setup I&#39;ve used, and flag the stuff the savings pitch leaves out.</p>
<p>What&#39;s covered:</p>
<ul>
<li>Why email platforms charge more as your list grows, and what you&#39;re actually paying them for (hint: it&#39;s deliverability, not the dashboard)</li>
<li>The three versions of &quot;replace it with AI&quot; — the basics, the custom bonus layer, and the top-end rebuild that&#39;s probably not worth it</li>
<li>The setup: Resend for sending, Supabase for storing your list, and AI agents to run the whole thing</li>
<li>Real costs — Resend&#39;s free tier (100 emails/day, 3,000/month) and the $20/month paid tier</li>
<li>How to build in unsubscribes the right way with a Supabase edge function</li>
<li>A custom example: auto-sending a one-time thank-you email on a customer&#39;s first purchase</li>
<li>Putting a simple interface on top so your team can send without touching a command line</li>
<li>Three things to watch for: owning your own edge cases, rebuilding advanced automations, and protecting your sender reputation on shared tiers</li>
</ul>
<p>Tools mentioned: Resend, Supabase.</p>
<hr>
<p>Got a question you&#39;ve been wondering about — can AI do this thing? Send it to <a href="mailto:drew@workandwhistle.co">drew@workandwhistle.co</a>.</p>
<p><em>AI Honestly is a <strong>Work and Whistle</strong> production. More at <a href="https://workandwhistle.co">workandwhistle.co</a>.</em></p>]]></content:encoded>
      <podcast:transcript url="https://aihonestly.workandwhistle.co/transcripts/001.vtt" type="text/vtt"/>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
